Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2809.1560365575@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2019-Apr-29, Tom Lane wrote: >> Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io> writes: >>> Have we decided if this will be applied to back branches? >> My feeling about it is "maybe eventually, but most definitely not >> the week before a set of minor releases". Some positive experience >> with Greenplum would help increase confidence in the patch, for sure. > I looked at the buildfarm failures for the recoveryCheck stage. It > looks like there is only one failure for branch master after this > commit, which was chipmunk saying: > ... > AFAICS this is wholly unrelated to the problem at hand. Yeah, that seems unrelated. > No other animal failed recoveryCheck test; before the commit, the > failure was not terribly frequent, but rarely would 10 days go by > without it failing. So I suggest that the bug has indeed been fixed. I feel pretty good about it too. > Maybe now's a good time to get it back-patched? Should we do that now, or wait till after next week's releases? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: