Re: CIDR index use for '<<' operator
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CIDR index use for '<<' operator |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28089.970727483@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CIDR index use for '<<' operator ("Kendall Koning" <kkoning@egl.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: CIDR index use for '<<' operator
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Kendall Koning" <kkoning@egl.net> writes: > Postgres doesn't seem to make use of indexes when doing operations with the > CIDR '<<' (contains) operator. You're right --- the system has no idea that the '<<' operator has any relationship to the sort ordering of CIDR indexes. Seems like it'd be possible to improve this along the same lines that we use to make LIKE and regexp matches indexable: derive lower and upper bounds on the CIDR variable from a 'cidr-var << cidr-constant' clause, and use those to create 'cidr-var >= lower-bound AND cidr-var <= upper-bound' indexscan limit clauses. If you feel like tackling this, the "special index operator" support in src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c is the stuff that'd need to be extended. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: