Re: Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28084.1220748948@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> writes: > Submission review: we generally prefer having patches archived on our > mailing lists, so please just send future patches or revisions of this > patch to our lists (I prefer -hackers, but probably -patches is still > the official one). Please. But -patches is dead, please use -hackers. > The documentation should go into a README file of the > contrib module or some such. No, it should go into the SGML docs, specifically doc/src/sgml/intarray.sgml and intagg.sgml. We got rid of flat-text README documentation for contrib in 8.3, and are not about to permit any backsliding. > Summary: My general feeling is, that this patch should be applied after > minor code style corrections. As a longer term goal I think intagg > should be integrated into core, since it's very basic functionality. Well, what should be integrated is generic (non-datatype-specific) versions of this functionality, ie functions working on anyarray/anyelement not just int4[]/int4. There was some discussion about that a few days ago. I'm not really sure how painful it would be to do; probably the generalization to non-fixed-width types would be the trickiest part. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: