Re: BUG #17387: Working in PG13 but not in PGH14: array_agg(RECORD)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17387: Working in PG13 but not in PGH14: array_agg(RECORD) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2807139.1643406198@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17387: Working in PG13 but not in PGH14: array_agg(RECORD) (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17387: Working in PG13 but not in PGH14: array_agg(RECORD)
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > pá 28. 1. 2022 v 21:19 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> > napsal: >> Probably it is side effect of this patch >> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/9e38c2bb5093ceb0c04d6315ccd8975bd17add66#diff-e2a931f90073b784e341960c6fe1f48aaea4b5d57eb4388143534eec3863477b > anycompatible* types are less sensitive to different data types, but it > increases a risk of possibility of errors when more than one function can > be detected for execution on analysis of function's signatures. Hmm. We have regression=# \do || List of operators Schema | Name | Left arg type | Right arg type | Result type | Description ------------+------+--------------------+--------------------+--------------------+------------------------------------- pg_catalog | || | anycompatible | anycompatiblearray | anycompatiblearray | prepend element onto front of array pg_catalog | || | anycompatiblearray | anycompatible | anycompatiblearray | append element onto end of array pg_catalog | || | anycompatiblearray | anycompatiblearray | anycompatiblearray | concatenate ... where before it was pg_catalog | || | anyelement | anyarray | anyarray | prepend element onto front of array pg_catalog | || | anyarray | anyelement | anyarray | append element onto end of array pg_catalog | || | anyarray | anyarray | anyarray | concatenate which was non-ambiguous because in this usage, anyelement wouldn't match an array type. I wonder why that's not happening with the anycompatible family? We could s/anycompatible/anycompatiblenonarray/ in the catalog entries, but it seems like we shouldn't have to. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: