Re: Question about Idle in TX
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about Idle in TX |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28051.1280865447@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question about Idle in TX (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question about Idle in TX
Re: Question about Idle in TX |
Список | pgsql-general |
David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net> writes: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:49:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > - In recent versions of PG, no. Before about 8.3 it was a Really Bad Idea, > - because the open transaction would prevent VACUUM from reclaiming storage. > We're on 8.3.9, so hopefully it's fairly safe then? Should be. You might want to test it just to make sure I'm recalling correctly when that got fixed. Do a BEGIN in one session, then in another session insert and delete some rows in a table, then VACUUM VERBOSE and see if they get cleaned up. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: