Re: FATAL: index contains unexpected zero page at block
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FATAL: index contains unexpected zero page at block |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28041.1352933439@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | FATAL: index contains unexpected zero page at block (Dmitriy Tyugaev <dtyugaev@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: FATAL: index contains unexpected zero page at block
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dmitriy Tyugaev <dtyugaev@gmail.com> writes: > Nov 14 18:24:04 uno postgres84[24208]: [6-1] user=,db= LOG: redo done at > 237B/90A1DF98 > Nov 14 18:24:04 uno postgres84[24208]: [7-1] user=,db= LOG: last completed > transaction was at log time 2012-11-10 10:26:28.484922+04 > Nov 14 18:24:04 uno postgres84[24208]: [8-1] user=,db= FATAL: index > "316879235" contains unexpected zero page at block 264 > Nov 14 18:24:04 uno postgres84[24208]: [8-2] user=,db= HINT: Please > REINDEX it. Hm. Apparently it's hitting the zero page while trying to clean up an incomplete index page split after reaching the end of WAL. This is not good --- it means your filesystem failed to retain data that it claimed had been written to disk safely. You should look into fsync-related system settings after you get out of the immediate problem. As far as getting out of the immediate problem is concerned, I think you have little option except to use pg_resetxlog. This will mean the loss of whatever actions it was trying to replay, which may well mean that you end up with data corruption (not just index corruption). I'd suggest a dump and reload after you get the server to start. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: