Re: [BUGFIX] amcanbackward is not checked before building backward index paths
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGFIX] amcanbackward is not checked before building backward index paths |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 28000.1526573863@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGFIX] amcanbackward is not checked before building backwardindex paths ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGFIX] amcanbackward is not checked before building backwardindex paths
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Maybe "Can the scan direction be reversed in mid-scan?". I'm not >> absolutely sure that that's better ... > A cursory read might conclude that "reversing" can only happen once while > they will likely understand that "changing" can happen multiple times. > This is minor point - the two are effectively the same. > Maybe: "Supports both FETCH FORWARD and FETCH BACKWARD during the same scan" Oh, yeah, mentioning what it's *for* would help clarify things, no? So perhaps "Can the scan direction be changed in mid-scan (to support FETCH FORWARD and FETCH BACKWARD on a cursor)?" > Or: > "Supports SCROLL(able) WITHOUT HOLD cursors" That seems a bit more vague/indirect. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: