Re: What about Perl autodie?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What about Perl autodie? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27a8f7cb-1378-855e-2c50-a57302625a83@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What about Perl autodie? (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: What about Perl autodie?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-02-08 Th 11:08, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 8 Feb 2024, at 16:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> 2. Don't wait, migrate them all now. This would mean requiring >> Perl 5.10.1 or later to run the TAP tests, even in back branches. >> >> I think #2 might not be all that radical. We have nothing older >> than 5.14.0 in the buildfarm, so we don't really have much grounds >> for claiming that 5.8.3 will work today. And 5.10.1 came out in >> 2009, so how likely is it that anyone cares anymore? > I would vote for this option, if we don't run the trailing edge anywhere where > breakage is visible to developers then it is like you say, far from guaranteed > to work. > +1 from me too. We kept 5.8 going for a while because it was what the Msys (v1) DTK perl was, but that doesn't matter any more I think. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: