Re: O_DIRECT for relations and SLRUs (Prototype)
От | Andrey Borodin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: O_DIRECT for relations and SLRUs (Prototype) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27FDEBE7-D07C-43D9-8A51-C883BD731438@yandex-team.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: O_DIRECT for relations and SLRUs (Prototype) (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 13 янв. 2019 г., в 14:02, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> написал(а): > >> 3. We probably want SLRUs to use the main buffer pool, instead of >> their own mini-pools, so they can benefit from the above. > > Wasn't there a thread about that on -hackers actually? I cannot see > any reference to it. I think it's here https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D0o-%3Dd8QPO%3DYGFiBSqq2p6KOvPVKG3bggZi5Pv4nQw8nw%40mail.gmail.com#bacee3e6612c53c31658b18650e7ffd9 > As long as the option can be controlled and > defaults to false, it seems to be that we could do something. Even if > the performance is bad, this gives the user control of how he/she > wants things to be done. I like the idea of having this switch, I believe it will make development in this direction easier. But I think there will be complain from users like "this feature is done wrong" due to really bad performance. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: