Re: Extended protocol logging

On 31-Oct-06, at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes:
>> These are logs from Beta 2.
>
> With what logging settings?  log_duration has rather different  
> behavior
> from what it used to do.

to be honest I don't know, and looking at the logs I suspect that  
this is just logging duration, however it's still looking pretty  
ambiguous. ( I will get the settings, my client is on the other side  
of the world)

what exactly does it mean ? The total operation was  4.365ms and the  
parse was .672 and bind was .128? Is it possible for different  
connections to be interleaved? I still think having the parse,  
bind,execute show the statement name makes sense if for no other  
reason than clarity. I would think writing a log parser would be  
fairly challenging without them.

Dave
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of  
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>