Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27EAC430-8609-4BAB-9B30-31C485C32C11@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: predefined role(s) for VACUUM and ANALYZE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sep 7, 2022, at 4:09 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > Calling this a redesign is over-stating things, imv … and I’d much rather have the per-relation granularity than predefinedroles for this, so there is that to consider too, perhaps. Ok, now I'm a bit lost. If I want to use Nathan's feature to create a role to vacuum and analyze my database on a regularbasis, how does per-relation granularity help me? If somebody creates a new table and doesn't grant those privilegesto the role, doesn't that break the usage case? To me, per-relation granularity sounds useful, but orthogonal,to this feature. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: