Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27995.1247511737@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [RFC] obtaining the function call stack (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack
Re: [RFC] obtaining the function call stack |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > So, the idea is to have a stack maintained by the function manager; each > called function enters an element in it containing the interesting > information about the function. We'd have another function that would > return this stack as a result set. (With this arrangement, the topmost > element would always appear to be this "peek" function.) > I haven't looked at the code to see how this would actually be > implemented, so I don't have more details to offer. Does anybody have > opinions on the matter? The performance and error recovery implications are unfavorable. Just how badly do you need this, and for what? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: