Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27980.1323790650@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > 2011/12/13 Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>: >> Either that, or couldn't you pass an option List as data type "internal"? > this is question - internal is most simply solution, but then we > cannot to call check function directly Yeah, one of the proposals for allowing people to specify complicated conditions about what to check was to tell them to doselect checker(oid) from pg_proc where any-random-condition; If the checker isn't user-callable then we lose that escape hatch, and the only selection conditions that will ever be possible are the ones we take the trouble to shoehorn into the CHECK FUNCTION statement. Doesn't seem like a good thing to me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: