Re: tweak to a few index tests to hits ambuildempty() routine.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tweak to a few index tests to hits ambuildempty() routine. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2797388.1664121119@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tweak to a few index tests to hits ambuildempty() routine. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: tweak to a few index tests to hits ambuildempty() routine.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Yeah. You can see that the coverage-test animal is not reaching it > anymore: > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/access/gin/ginvacuum.c.gcov.html That's what it's saying *now*, but after rereading this whole thread I see that it apparently said something different last week. So the coverage is probabilistic, which squares with this discussion and with some tests I just did locally. That's not good. I shudder to imagine how much time somebody might waste trying to locate a bug in this area, if a test failure appears and disappears regardless of code changes they make while chasing it. I propose that we revert 4fb5c794e and instead add separate test cases that just create unlogged indexes (I guess they don't actually need to *do* anything with them?). Looks like dec8ad367 could be reverted as well, in view of 2f2e24d90. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: