Re: Client application name
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Client application name |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27924.1256136549@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Client application name (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Client application name
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes: > Should we perhaps change the behaviour of the backend to give a > warning only for unknown settings in the startup packet? It's not going to help, unless you first invent a time machine so we can retroactively cause all PG servers that are already in the field to behave that way. > It doesn't > seem beyond the realms of possibility that we might want to add > something else in the future, and this will at least mean that in a > few releases time it might be reasonably safe to do so. This might be a good argument for changing that going forward, but it will be *years* before we can rely on it for anything. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: