Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27915.1166472050@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Matt Miller wrote: >> However, the patch will not apply to cvs branch REL8_2_0. This all >> raises the question: what's the difference between REL8_2_STABLE, >> REL8_2_0, and the 8.2.0 tarball? > STABLE doesn't mean static. It's the branch for what will be the 8.1.x > series. But REL8_2_0 should correspond pretty closely to the tarball, I > believe. REL8_2_0 is a tag, not a branch, and should correspond *exactly* to the contents of the 8.2.0 tarball. The REL8_2_STABLE branch by now contains a number of bug fixes, but that would only cause a patch failure if the patch were trying to tweak one of the code sections changed for bug fixing, which seems a tad unlikely. > Until we see the rejects it's hard to tell what the problem is, > though. Yeah, this is all pretty meaningless without seeing the rejects. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: