Re: One-Shot Plans
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One-Shot Plans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27870.1312220372@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One-Shot Plans (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: One-Shot Plans
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > One of the things I was looking at doing was allowing the operator > estimation functions mark the plan as "one-shot" if they used > non-uniform data to predict the estimate. That would require most > functions to observe the rule that if a plan is marked unsafe then > nobody marks it safe again later. More of a guideline, really. > For example, if we a doing a PK retrieval it will have a uniform > distribution and so we can always use the final plan, whereas a plan > that relates to a highly skewed distribution would be dangerous and so > would be marked one-shot. I fail to detect the sanity in that. You seem to be confusing "skewed" with "changing rapidly". There's no reason to assume that a nonuniform distribution is less stable than one that is uniform, and in any case we already invalidate all plans related to a table after any update of the statistics by ANALYZE. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: