Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2775989.1648060014@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes: > The patch Pushed. Thank you! My hoary animal prairiedog doesn't like this [1]: # Failed test 'concurrent update with retrying stderr /(?s-xim:client (0|1) got an error in command 3 \\(SQL\\) of script0; ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update\\b.*\\g1)/' # at t/001_pgbench_with_server.pl line 1229. # 'pgbench: pghost: /tmp/nhghgwAoki pgport: 58259 nclients: 2 nxacts: 1 dbName: postgres ... # pgbench: client 0 got an error in command 3 (SQL) of script 0; ERROR: could not serialize access due to concurrent update ... # ' # doesn't match '(?s-xim:client (0|1) got an error in command 3 \\(SQL\\) of script 0; ERROR: could not serialize accessdue to concurrent update\\b.*\\g1)' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 425. I'm not sure what the "\\b.*\\g1" part of this regex is meant to accomplish, but it seems to be assuming more than it should about the output format of TAP messages. regards, tom lane [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2022-03-23%2013%3A21%3A44
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: