Re: unixODBC distribution installs newer odbcpsql libs
От | Palle Girgensohn |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unixODBC distribution installs newer odbcpsql libs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27650000.1012934263@elbas.partitur.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unixODBC distribution installs newer odbcpsql libs (Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi again, I see a big problem here, if a sysadm first installs unixODBC, then postgres-odbc, then update unixODBC, the symlink for libodbcpsql.so will point to the latest version, i.e. version `2'. The postgresql has version `0', and version `2' is older and less functional... This is very confusing. Can we do anything about it? :( /Palle --On Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:52:52 +0100 Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se> wrote: > --On Monday, February 04, 2002 23:28:16 -0500 Peter Eisentraut > <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > >> Palle Girgensohn writes: >> >>> I installed the unixODBC at 02:31, and postgres odbc at 03:11... >>> (sic...), anyway, unixODBC apparently has support for postgresql built >>> in. Which distribution should I use and recommend? >> >> The PostgreSQL ODBC driver has seen a lot of work since 7.1. At first >> glance, it doesn't seem like unixODBC has merged up on those yet. The >> version number choice is bogus and can be ignored. > > OK. I'm preparing the ports collection for FreeBSD, so I will have to add > a note about this, I guess... This would be very confusing for users. > Maybe we could bump the .so version number? Or perhaps, the unixODBC > people be pursuaded to merge up? > > /Palle
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: