Re: Use select and update together
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Use select and update together |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27584.1316276202@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Use select and update together (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> writes: > On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 16:56 +0200, Andreas wrote: >> select * from ( >> update tbl set val = 1 where key in ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ) returning * >> ) as x >> >> wouldn't work even in PG 9.1. >> So what data structure is coming out of an "update ... returning *" >> statement? >> It obviously doesn't work like a subquery. > The only way to make something like this work in 9.1 would be: > WITH x AS > (update tbl set val = 1 where key in ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ) returning *) > SELECT * FROM x; The reason for that restriction is that WITH guarantees that the contained query is evaluated once and only once, whereas an ordinary subquery guarantees no such thing. So the effects of the UPDATE would be quite unpredictable if we allowed the former syntax. (In the specific example given it would likely work all right anyway, since there is no reason for a plain SELECT FROM to do anything except scan the subquery once. But if you did a join, say, watch out!) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: