Re: New version numbering practices
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New version numbering practices |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27551.1470241643@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New version numbering practices (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New version numbering practices
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 8/1/16 9:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> I don't see any value to the _STABLE >> suffix, given the way we treat branches. > It would be nice to be able to tell easily from convention whether > something is a branch or a tag. Well, the rule would be that "REL_xx" is a branch, "REL_xx_yy" is a release tag. Neither of these is confusable with old-style branch or tag names. The alternative seems to be saying that "REL_xx_STABLE" is a branch while "REL_xx_yy" is a release tag. That works but it doesn't seem to have all that much to recommend it; unless there is code in the buildfarm or elsewhere that really wants to see _STABLE in the branch names. > Anyway, this is a question for many months from now. True, but we might as well make the decisions now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: