Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27536.1386102906@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > If we care about our performance on various operating systems it is > _OUR_ responsibility to track that closely and automated and report back > and only if that feedback loop fails to work we are actually in a real > position to consider something as drastical as considering a platform > "undependable" or looking into alternatives (like directIO). +1. I fail to understand why anyone would think it's a good idea for us to build our own I/O stack. The resources that would be consumed by that would probably be enough to sink the project, or at least ensure that we made no progress on any other aspect of the system for a good long time. (And I'm just talking development, never mind maintenance.) Far better to invest some effort in providing decent feedback to the platforms we depend on. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: