Re: Keepalive
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Keepalive |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2753414.1718493927@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Keepalive (Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Keepalive
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com> writes: > Actually, I just tested on it the Linux system. The keep alive event occurred, the kernel state of the connection wentto CLOSE_WAIT and then it was later completely removed from the kernel state; however, my spinner() function is stillrunning with no network connection in the kernel table. > So, keep alive does behave differently between FreeBSD and Linux. I really do prefer FreeBSD for many reasons. The behavior you report for Linux is what I'd expect anywhere. I tried to replicate your results on a freshly-updated FreeBSD 14.1 installation, and could not. With a purely stock Postgres configuration, I see the "spinner" query running indefinitely after the client is killed --- although the kernel does show the server process's client connection being in CLOSE_WAIT state. But if I set client_connection_check_interval to a positive value then the query kills itself at the next multiple of that time, again as expected. So I think there is something non-default about your FreeBSD system. Maybe you'd previously configured it with nonzero client_connection_check_interval, and then forgot about that? The alternative is to suppose that that kernel will kill processes as soon as they have a connection in CLOSE_WAIT state, which would be quite evil for many purposes and is certainly not a "preferable" behavior. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: