Re: bitmap AM design
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bitmap AM design |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27526.1109950104@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bitmap AM design (pgsql@mohawksoft.com) |
Ответы |
Re: bitmap AM design
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
pgsql@mohawksoft.com writes: > Anyway, IMHO, hash indexes would be dramatically improved if you could > specify your own hashing function That's called a custom operator class. > and declare initial table size. It would be interesting to see if setting up the hashtable with about the right number of buckets initially would make CREATE INDEX enough faster to be a win ... but that doesn't mean I want to make the user deal with it. We could probably hack hashbuild() to estimate the size of the parent table using the same code that the planner is now using (ie, actual size in pages times a possibly-dead-reckoning rows per page estimate). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: