Re: Problems with pg_restore (plpgsql already exists)
От | Scott Ribe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problems with pg_restore (plpgsql already exists) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 274BAD81-38BF-4537-B474-ADCDF77E318A@elevated-dev.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problems with pg_restore (plpgsql already exists) (Brian Weaver <cmdrclueless@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problems with pg_restore (plpgsql already exists)
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Feb 25, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Brian Weaver wrote: > Thanks for the pointer. Is it just me that finds it the behavior of pg_restore odd? If the default installation since 9.0has PL/PgSQL installed then why does pg_restore still emit statements to create the language? As a developer by tradeit smells like a bug. It's pg_dump that's emitting the command to create the language. If you ran pg_dump from 9.0+, it would not do so. This isan example of why the standard advice for upgrading is to use the newer pg_dump against the older database--you can oftenget away without doing that, and I am one of those people who often ignores that advice and does things the easier wayuntil it breaks, but it is safer. -- Scott Ribe scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: