Re: streamlined standby procedure
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: streamlined standby procedure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27495.1139336398@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: streamlined standby procedure (Andrew Rawnsley <ronz@investoranalytics.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: streamlined standby procedure
Re: streamlined standby procedure |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Rawnsley <ronz@investoranalytics.com> writes: > IMHO the #1 priority in the current PITR/WAL shipping system is to make the > standby able to tolerate being shut down and restarted, i.e. actually having > a true standby mode and not the current method of doing it only on startup. How is shutting down the standby a good idea? Seems like that will block the master too --- or at least result in WAL log files piling up rapidly. If the standby goes off-line, abandoning it and starting from a fresh base backup when you are ready to restart it seems like the most likely recovery path. For sure I don't see this as the "#1 priority". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: