Re: Access restriction
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Access restriction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27427.975513000@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Access restriction (GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
GH <grasshacker@over-yonder.net> writes: >> I think you want "sameuser" in pg_hba.conf. > Would you mind elaborating on that a bit for me? > i.e. Where should it go in pg_hba.conf? > I don't think I saw this in the docs... It's right in pg_hba.conf: # Format: # # host DBNAME IP_ADDRESS ADDRESS_MASK AUTHTYPE [AUTH_ARGUMENT] # # DBNAME is the name of a PostgreSQL database, or "all" to indicate all # databases, or "sameuser" to restrict a user's access to a database with # the same name as the user. One thing this doesn't make too clear is that the "restriction" really means that this record *matches* if the username and the database name are the same. Else the postmaster moves on, looking for another matching record. A possibly useful example: localhost sameuser ident localhost all passwd passfile This would mean that a user would get let into his own database on the basis of IDENT checking, and would get let into other databases on the basis of password checking using passwords in $PGDATA/passfile. Since you'd control the contents of this last file, this would allow you to grant access to all databases to only selected users. You want some sort of escape hatch like that, at least for the DBA --- else he couldn't get into any database but his own, either. Superusers aren't super as far as the postmaster is concerned... they have to pass the authentication tests the same as mere mortals. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: