Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27393.1333555030@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend
Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes: > Those code fragment judges the return value from > SSL_read(). secure_read() does retrying when SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ *and* > SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE returned. However, pqsecure_read() does not retry > when SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ. It seems they are not consistent. Comments? There's no particular reason why they should be consistent, I think. The assumptions for nonblocking operation are different. I rather wonder whether the #ifdef WIN32 bit in the backend isn't dead code though. If the port isn't in nonblock mode, we shouldn't really get here at all, should we? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: