Re: speed up a logical replica setup
От | Euler Taveira |
---|---|
Тема | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2736443c-58e3-42df-8cc4-8c66106e3da5@app.fastmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: speed up a logical replica setup (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: speed up a logical replica setup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 1, 2024, at 7:14 AM, vignesh C wrote:
1) This Assert can fail if source is shutdown:+static void+drop_replication_slot(PGconn *conn, LogicalRepInfo *dbinfo, constchar *slot_name)+{+ PQExpBuffer str = createPQExpBuffer();+ PGresult *res;++ Assert(conn != NULL);
Oops. I'll remove it.
2) Should we have some checks to see if the max replication slotconfiguration is ok based on the number of slots that will be created,we have similar checks in upgrade replication slots incheck_new_cluster_logical_replication_slots
That's a good idea.
3) Should we check if wal_level is set to logical, we have similarchecks in upgrade replication slots incheck_new_cluster_logical_replication_slots
That's a good idea.
4) The physical replication slot that was created will still bepresent in the primary node, I felt this should be removed.
My proposal is to remove it [1]. It'll be include in the next version.
5) I felt the target server should be started before completion ofpg_subscriber:
Why? The initial version had an option to stop the subscriber. I decided to
remove the option and stop the subscriber by default mainly because (1) it is
an extra step to start the server (another point is that the WAL retention
doesn't happen due to additional (synchronized?) replication slots on
subscriber -- point 2). It was a conservative choice. If point 2 isn't an
issue, imo point 1 is no big deal.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: