Re: .gitignore files, take two
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: .gitignore files, take two |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2735.1285081350@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: .gitignore files, take two (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: .gitignore files, take two
Re: .gitignore files, take two Re: .gitignore files, take two |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On tis, 2010-09-21 at 00:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> 3. What are the ignore filesets *for*, in particular should they list >> just the derived files expected in a distribution tarball, or all the >> files in the set of build products in a normal build? > My personal vote: Forget the whole thing. The folks who are more familiar with git than I seem to be pretty clear that we need to ignore all build products. I don't think that "ignore nothing" is going to work pleasantly at all. On reflection I realize that cvs ignore and git ignore are considerably different because they come into play at different times: cvs ignore really only matters while doing "cvs update" to pull in new code, while git ignore matters while you're constructing a commit. So you really do need git ignore to ignore all build products; otherwise you'll have lots of chatter in "git status". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: