Re: BUG #16959: Unnesting null from string_to_array silently removes whole rows from result
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16959: Unnesting null from string_to_array silently removes whole rows from result |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2734126.1618188397@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #16959: Unnesting null from string_to_array silently removes whole rows from result (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16959: Unnesting null from string_to_array silently removes whole rows from result
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > Sample data: > create table test_rows as > SELECT * FROM (VALUES (1, null), (2, 'second')) AS t (num,letter); > Query with the unexpected result (I expected 2 rows): > select num, unnest(string_to_array(letter, ',')) from test_rows; > num | unnest > ----+-------- > 2 | second > (1 row) Well, you could perhaps argue that string_to_array with NULL input should produce an empty array rather than a NULL. But UNNEST() would produce zero rows in either case, and I fail to see why you find that surprising, much less buggy. It would be a bug if it manufactured a value out of nothing. Having said that, you could inject the value you prefer using COALESCE, say # select num, unnest(coalesce(string_to_array(letter, ','), '{""}')) from test_rows; num | unnest -----+-------- 1 | 2 | second (2 rows) Alternatively, perhaps you'd consider a lateral left join to be less-surprising behavior: # select num, u from test_rows left join lateral unnest(string_to_array(letter, ',')) u on true; num | u -----+-------- 1 | 2 | second (2 rows) The behavior you're getting from SRF-in-the-targetlist is basically equivalent to a lateral plain join, rather than left join. See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/xfunc-sql.html#XFUNC-SQL-FUNCTIONS-RETURNING-SET regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: