Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27329.1299015506@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > On Mar 1, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> The question is what collation property the >> citext type needs to have, and how we get it to have that setting during >> an upgrade from 9.0. See >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/11548.1297983024@sss.pgh.pa.us > Ah, I remember now. That lead to this: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-02/msg01824.php > So it looks like what Peter said about updating the catalog is what needs to be done, and is simple, yes? But then pg_dumpneeds more collation-juju. Am I right? Yeah, the real problem in my mind is not so much citext as whether the current representation of a type's collation property is sane in the first place. Once we've thrashed that out, I'll be happy with a simple "UPDATE pg_type" kluge in the citext upgrade script. Doing anything cleaner-looking than that is a future project (and might never happen, seeing that we've never felt a need for ALTER TYPE commands for other properties of a basic type). So really I guess the release-blocker issue is http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/27152.1299015062@sss.pgh.pa.us regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: