Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2729258.1714764093@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 03.05.24 10:39, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> They are no-ops when linking against v18, but writing an extension which
>> targets all supported versions of postgres along with their respective
>> supported OpenSSL versions make them still required, or am I missing something?
> I don't think extensions come into play here, since this is libpq, so
> only the shared library interface compatibility matters.
Yeah, server-side extensions don't really seem to be at hazard,
but doesn't the argument apply to client-side applications and
libraries that want to work across different PG/OpenSSL versions?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: