Re: BUG #15611: pg_dump output changes after doing a restore with certain views
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15611: pg_dump output changes after doing a restore with certain views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27244.1549312619@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #15611: pg_dump output changes after doing a restore with certain views (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > When I do the following: > 1. Create a view with a `foo IN (arglist)` clause in the target list > 2. pg_dump > 3. Restore from the dump > 4. Run pg_dump again > The output of the two pg_dumps differs. Yeah, unfortunately it's difficult to do much about that without creating worse problems than we'd solve. The core of the issue here is that type varchar doesn't have its own equality operator, it uses text's. While the coercion to text is done implicitly when you first put in the expression, pg_dump shows it explicitly in order to be sure that the view will be re-parsed using the same operator as before. And then the parser is "smart" about a construct like "ARRAY[...]::type[]" and pushes the coercion down to the array elements; that's a bit of a hack but people would be sad if it went away. I've experimented with trying to make that happen while parsing IN initially, but that also fails, on examples like select * from pg_class where oid::regclass in ('sometable', 'someothertable'); Here it's *essential* to parse the literals as type regclass, not type OID which is what the comparison operator's input type is. So it's quite hard to twiddle any aspect of this behavior without causing somebody's use-case to break. TBH you could most easily dodge this problem by declaring your table column as type text not varchar. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: