Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27243.1521222563@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL nested CALL with transactions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2018-03-16 18:35 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <
> peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
>> Not very typical, but we apply the same execution context handling to
>> CALL and DO at the top level, so it would be weird not to propagate that.
> Although it is possible, I don't see any sense of introduction for DO into
> plpgsql. Looks like duplicate to EXECUTE.
Not sure what you think is being "introduced" here. It already works just
like any other random SQL command:
regression=# do $$
regression$# begin
regression$# raise notice 'outer';
regression$# do $i$ begin raise notice 'inner'; end $i$;
regression$# end $$;
NOTICE: outer
NOTICE: inner
DO
While certainly that's a bit silly as-is, I think it could have practical
use if the inner DO invokes a different PL.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: