Re: Unexpected result from ALTER FUNCTION— looks like a bug

Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:47:07AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> 
>> AFAICT the problem is that SET / RESET part is messing with the
>> HeapTuple, so you can't use the procForm reference afterwards.  Simply
>> processing parallel_item before set_items fixes the problem, as in the
>> attached.

> This time with the file.

Yeah, I arrived at the same fix.  Another possibility would be to
make the procForm pointer valid again after heap_modify_tuple,
but that seemed like it'd add more code for no really good reason.

            regards, tom lane