Re: [BUGS] Postgres bug (working with iserverd)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Postgres bug (working with iserverd) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27096.989887762@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > The direct cause of the problem is that EvalPlanQual isn't completely > initializing the estate that it sets up for re-evaluating the plan. > In particular it's not filling in es_result_relations and > es_num_result_relations, which need to be set up if the top plan node > is an Append. (That's probably my fault.) But there are a bunch of > other fields that it's failing to copy, too. I believe I have fixed this problem in CVS sources for current and REL7_1, at least to the extent that EvalPlanQual processing produces the right answers for updates/deletes in inheritance trees. However, EvalPlanQual still leaks more memory than suits me --- auxiliary memory allocated by the plan nodes is not recovered. I think the correct way to implement it would be to create a new memory context for each level of EvalPlanQual execution and use that context as the "per-query context" for the sub-query. The whole context (including the copied plan) would be freed at the end of the sub-query. The notion of a stack of currently-unused epqstate nodes would go away. This would mean a few more cycles per tuple to copy the plan tree over again each time, but I think that's pretty trivial compared to the plan startup/shutdown costs that we incur anyway. Besides, I have hopes of making plan trees read-only whenever we do the fabled querytree redesign, so the cost will someday go away. Comments, objections? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: