Re: snprintf()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: snprintf() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27082.1170474748@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | snprintf() (Kate F <kate@cats.meow.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: snprintf()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kate F <kate@cats.meow.at> writes: > ... does PostgreSQL replace my system's snprintf() prototype with > its own implementation's? We do on some platforms where configure decides the system version is deficient ... I don't recall the exact conditions at the moment. I wouldn't really have expected that to happen on any *BSD, but you could look into the generated Makefile.global to find out. > For reference, the relevant part of C99: > 7.19.6.5 2 If n is zero, nothing is written, and s may be a null > pointer. For reference, the relevant part of the Single Unix Spec: If the value of n is zero on a call to snprintf(), anunspecified value less than 1 is returned. So the behavior you'd like to depend on is unportable anyway, and that coding will get rejected if submitted as a Postgres patch. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: