Paul Lambert <paul.lambert@autoledgers.com.au> writes:
> My initial assumption was that the ODBC driver makes an assumption that
> standard_conforming_strings will not be on and adjusts the table names
> accordingly.
Which ODBC driver version are you using? I'd quite expect a pre-8.2
release to not be prepared to deal with this. If the 8.2 version still
can't hack it then you've got a legitimate beef ...
regards, tom lane