Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 27022.944668952@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: >> Kind of like a simple semaphore. Isn't that what you are getting at? > LISTEN/NOTIFY might be useful for this... LISTEN/NOTIFY would be one of the things we were trying to *test*. It's not helpful for checking intra-transaction-block behavior anyway, since notifys are only sent at commit and only heard between transactions. I like the tcl/expect idea a lot. We'd have to upgrade our tcl interface to support asynchronous queries (ie, send query then do other stuff until answer arrives); AFAIR it can't handle that now. But that'd be well worth doing anyway... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: