Re: jaguar is up
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: jaguar is up |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2700.1196314857@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: jaguar is up (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> I didn't do anything about it at the time, but now I am tempted to >> modify LookupOpclassInfo() so that CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS disables >> its internal cache. Any objections? > That sounds not equivalent to receiving a relcache flush at any particular > point in time where a relcache flush could be received. Wouldn't it make more > sense (and test more code) to go ahead and cache all the same data but flush > it whenever a relcache flush could possibly be received? CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS already did that. I'm too lazy to go back and reconstruct the exact sequence of events that led to the problem last December, but the basic issue is that LookupOpclassInfo had its own caching in front of the syscache flush, and that was able to obscure a cache flush race condition that only happened when LookupOpclassInfo had to actually load data. If you really want to question this, I suggest loading up a CVS snapshot from late last December and trying to reproduce the intermittent buildfarm failures we were seeing then. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: