Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

On 5/12/16 4:23 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> Hmm, my bad. Seems like what I thought was a long-standing practice
> was long forgotten. FYI, here's where it was established:
>
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/200007280252.WAA05977@candle.pha.pa.us#200007280252.WAA05977@candle.pha.pa.us
> (many, many years ago - man I feel old!).
>
> The resulting change to purge the docs (of the then single reference
> to an external app) was in 530dc73cd18f4df708c0c998521a20f5f93f729a.

What was removed then was the *man page* of pgadmin.

Earlier in that thread, someone said:

"It's certainly nice to mention related products, but maybe a reference
page is not the most appropriate form"

which someone later interpreted as an incentive to a purge. :-/

I think these principles still apply today, and most in this thread
appear to agree: Mention tools in the right context.

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services