Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26b22098-4dc6-6517-49a5-766e3443002f@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/11/17 21:59, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> I imagine that pg_dump -s would be the basic operation that users >> would do first before creating a subcription on a secondary node, but >> what I find surprising is that publications are dumped by default. I >> don't find confusing that those are actually included by default to be >> consistent with the way subcriptions are handled, what I find >> confusing is that there are no options to not dump them, and no >> options to bypass their restore. >> >> So, any opinions about having pg_dump/pg_restore --no-publications? > > And that's really a boring patch, giving the attached. committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: