Re: failure to drop table due to pg_temp_7 schema

On 11/15/25 12:25, Peter 'PMc' Much wrote:

> In this case, I looked into what Rails now supports as a scheduler,
> and found it too elabore (for now) to grok in-depth. And a small
> and a bit older tool has an advantage, that one can quite easily
> understand it and, if need arises, make it do what is locally
> required. So it's a balance. And in recent years, the modernizations
> often happened to curtate in delightfulness (with PostgreSQL sadly
> not being an exception).

Where is delightfulness short changed in?:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/release-18.html#RELEASE-18-HIGHLIGHTS



-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com