Re: My question about the transaction
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: My question about the transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 269d1ab8-afea-45e6-8774-45ca569b0312@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | My question about the transaction ("Wen Yi" <wen-yi@qq.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/19/23 04:36, Wen Yi wrote: > Hi community, > I am learning the transaction of the postgresql, and I try to test using > these: > > ###### > > terminal 1: > > postgres=# select * from t; > number > -------- > 1 > (1 row) > > postgres=# update t set number = 2; > UPDATE 1 > postgres=# select * from t; > number > -------- > 2 > (1 row) > > postgres=# select * from t; > number > -------- > 2 > (1 row) > > postgres=# > > ###### > > terminal 2: > > postgres=# create table t (number integer); > CREATE TABLE > postgres=# insert into t values (1); > INSERT 0 1 > postgres=# begin; > BEGIN > postgres=*# insert into t values (2); > INSERT 0 1 > postgres=*# select * from t; > number > -------- > 2 > 2 > (2 rows) > > postgres=*# rollback; > ROLLBACK > > My question is, in my view, the transaction model should make sure that > when one on-process transaction don't commit itself, the data on this > transaction shouldn't can be modified by other transaction(I the > single-statement also be treated as a simple transaction), but why the > update works?(I think terminal 1 will block until the terminal 2's > transaction commit or rollback). > Can someone share you opinion to me? Assuming you did in order, where terminal 1 = t1 and terminal 2 = t2: t2 create table t (number integer); t2 insert into t values (1); t1 select * from t; t1 update t set number = 2; t1 select * from t; t2 begin; t2 insert into t values (2); t2 select * from t; t1 select * from t; t2 rollback; Then it is as David said, the commands in t1 see the inserted value of 1 in table t and updates it as they are running in autocommit as where the commands in t2 before the begin;. Autocommit commits on each successful completion of a command. You then start am explicit transaction is t2 that sees the updated row and then adds a new row, both of which are seen in the t2 transaction but not in the t1 session. My suggestion would be to read through this: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/transaction-iso.html several times. There is a lot going on there. > Thanks in advance! > > Yours, > Wen Yi > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: