Re: Closing out the June commitfest
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Closing out the June commitfest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26988.1342401748@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Closing out the June commitfest (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Closing out the June commitfest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> Which three patches didn't get any review? > Or to be more specific: I'm in favor of closing out everything which has > had some review. I think the three patches without any review should be > dealt with case-by-case. Well, I might be wrong, but the ones that don't show any activity in the CF app are tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=818 Trim trailing NULL columns https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=840 Restrict ALTER FUNCTION CALLED ON NULL INPUT https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=854 (Note: some of the individual patches in the "logical replication" herd haven't been given individual reviews, but certainly that patchset as a whole has gotten its fair share of time and more.) None of the three above seem to me to be blocking further work, so I don't have a hard time with punting them to September. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: