Re: BUG #11986: psql uses pager inside Emacs shell buffer (not a terminal)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #11986: psql uses pager inside Emacs shell buffer (not a terminal) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26947.1417573493@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #11986: psql uses pager inside Emacs shell buffer (not a terminal) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #11986: psql uses pager inside Emacs shell buffer (not
a terminal)
Re: BUG #11986: psql uses pager inside Emacs shell buffer (not a terminal) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:34:34AM +0000, eda@waniasset.com wrote: >> It would be friendler for psql to be aware of this and not use a pager if >> running inside an Emacs shell buffer, or other dumb terminal: check if $TERM >> is set to 'dumb'. > This is an interesting idea. What are the odds that a "dumb" terminal > is inside Emacs? Is there another environment variable set by Emacs > that we can check? A truly dumb terminal would be where you'd need a pager the most, so I'm not enamored of this specific test proposal. If there's some more-specific way to detect that stdout is an Emacs buffer, I'd be for it. A quick check here shows a couple of different possibilities in the environment seen in a shell buffer: EMACS=t INSIDE_EMACS=23.1.1,comint I am not real sure of the properties of either of these variables though, in particular not whether they are present in all versions of Emacs. (The value of the second one seems to be an Emacs version identifier, fwiw.) Another question is whether any effort gets made to unset them in processes that are descendants of an Emacs but are not connected to a shell-buffer pty. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: