Re: pgsql: Allow GIN's extractQuery method to signal that nothing can
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Allow GIN's extractQuery method to signal that nothing can |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26945.1170261473@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Allow GIN's extractQuery method to signal that nothing can (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Allow GIN's extractQuery method to signal
that nothing can
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes: > amcanmulticol doesn't resolve issue, because restriction clause might present, > but it might have not any actual values ( void tsquery, void array ) and > semantic meaning of void query might be a 'any tuple matches'. Suggested > gincostestimation's patch allows to prevent from index in some situations, I > imagine, that isn't a good solution for two reason: > - high cost doesn't guarantee an indexscan will be choosen > - Doesn't work with anything except Const query > But I didn't find a better place to insert it to resolve first point. If you're going to support operators that could allow every tuple to match, then I think you had better find a way to allow a full index scan within GIN. Because the above does not fix the problem, it's only a very crude band-aid; you *cannot* assume that you'll always have Consts to look at. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: