Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26913.1246995720@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > With the wiki, the data of the old fests will pretty much stay what is > was, unless we change the wiki templates in drastic ways, as I > understand it. But if we did changes like the above, or more > complicated things, perhaps, what will happen? Perhaps we simply > don't care about the historical data. But if we do, we better have > pretty high confidence that the current application will do for a > while or is easily upgradable. I'm not convinced that we care in the least about commitfests that are more than a fest or two back; especially since the mailing lists archive all the interesting underlying data. However, if we did, the answer doesn't seem that hard: keep the old database instance on-line for serving up the old data, and put a new one beside it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: