Re: ILIKE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ILIKE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 26885.1046061082@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ILIKE (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ILIKE
Re: ILIKE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > - Some other databases support ILIKE and it makes porting easier. Which other ones? I checked our archives and found that when we were discussing adding ILIKE, it was claimed that Oracle had it. But I can't find anything on the net to verify that claim. I did find that mSQL (not MySQL) had it, as far back as 1996. Nothing else seems to --- but Google did provide a lot of hits on pages saying that ILIKE is a mighty handy Postgres-ism ;-) > Why this sudden urge to prune away perfectly useful operators? My feeling too. Whatever you may think of its usefulness, it's been a documented feature since 7.1. It's a bit late to reconsider. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: